Recon.

Recon vs Clay for Agency Data

One is a data orchestration platform. The other is a ready-made agency database. Different tools, different jobs.

Quick Verdict

Clay is a powerful data orchestration tool: you build your own workflows. Recon is a ready-made agency database: search and export in seconds. Clay = flexibility. Recon = speed.

Recon

Search. Filter. Export.

Pre-built agency database with 147,000+ profiles. Get leads in under 2 minutes.

Clay

Build. Enrich. Orchestrate.

Connect 100+ data sources. Build custom workflows. Unlimited flexibility.

Feature Comparison

FeatureReconClay
Ready-to-use agency data147,000+ profiles, searchable nowMust build from scratch
Setup time2 minutesHours to days
Learning curveNone: search bar + filtersSteep: workflow builder
Agency-specific filtersService type, pricing, Clutch, team sizeMust configure manually
Price for agency use case$149/mo all-inclusive$149-349/mo + credit costs
Data enrichmentPre-enriched agency profiles100+ enrichment sources
Workflow builderNot availableVisual workflow editor
APIGrowth + Enterprise plansAll plans
Pre-built agency profilesServices, clients, reviews, tech stackNot available
Time to first leadUnder 2 minutesHours (workflow setup required)

Need agency leads now, not next week?

Search 147,000+ agency profiles. Export in seconds.

Try Recon Free

Where Clay wins

Clay is an incredibly flexible data orchestration platform. If you need to pull data from 100+ sources, build custom enrichment chains, and create complex workflows that combine multiple data signals, Clay is unmatched. Their visual workflow builder lets data teams create sophisticated prospecting pipelines that no other tool can replicate.

Where Recon wins

Recon is purpose-built for one thing: finding agencies. There's no workflow to build, no credits to manage, no learning curve. You search, you filter, you export. The data is already enriched with agency-specific fields that Clay would require custom workflows to replicate.

Pricing comparison

Clay charges $149-349/mo for their platform, plus credits for each enrichment action. A typical agency prospecting workflow might cost 5-10 credits per lead. Recon charges $149/mo (Starter), $349/mo (Growth), or $499/mo (Enterprise) with no per-record charges. For agency-specific use cases, Recon's all-inclusive pricing is more predictable and often cheaper.

3 use cases where Recon wins

Need agency leads NOW

Your sales team has a meeting in an hour and needs a list of SEO agencies in Chicago. Recon: 2-minute search. Clay: build a workflow first.

Small team, no data engineer

You don't have someone to build and maintain Clay workflows. Recon works out of the box with zero technical setup.

Sales rep who wants to search, not build

Your reps should be selling, not configuring data pipelines. Recon's search interface is as simple as Google.

Who should use Clay instead

Data teams building complex, multi-source enrichment workflows across various industries. If you need to combine LinkedIn data with Clearbit firmographics with G2 intent signals with custom webhooks, Clay's workflow builder is the right tool. Clay is a platform; Recon is a product. Choose based on whether you want to build or search.

Search, don't build

147,000+ agency profiles. Pre-enriched. Ready to export.

Start Free with 25 Leads

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Recon better than Clay for finding agency leads?

For agency-specific leads, yes. Recon provides pre-built agency profiles with service types, client portfolios, and Clutch reviews, ready to search instantly. Clay requires you to build custom workflows from scratch.

How long does it take to get agency leads from Recon vs Clay?

Recon: under 2 minutes. Search, filter, export. Clay: hours to days, depending on workflow complexity. You need to connect data sources, build enrichment chains, and configure output.

Is Clay cheaper than Recon for agency data?

No. Clay is $149-349/mo plus credit costs for each enrichment. Recon is $149-499/mo all-inclusive with no per-record charges. For agency-specific use cases, Recon is more cost-effective.

Can Clay do everything Recon does?

Theoretically, you could build Clay workflows to replicate some Recon features. But Clay doesn't have a pre-built agency database with Clutch reviews, service types, or client portfolios. You'd need to source and enrich that data yourself.

When should I use Clay instead of Recon?

Use Clay when you need complex multi-source data enrichment across various verticals, or when your workflows require custom logic that goes beyond agency prospecting.

Does Recon have a workflow builder like Clay?

No. Recon is a search-and-export tool, not a workflow builder. If you need complex data orchestration, Clay is the better choice. If you need agency leads fast, Recon wins.

More comparisons

Try Recon Free